Neil Tennant tames the True by showing that nothing worth wanting as true in mathematics or natural science ranges beyond the limits of human knowledge. Any thing worthy of the name true in mathematics or natural science is in principle knowable ... Chapters 2 and 3 of Tennant's book make a significant contribution with their careful analyses of philosophical terms such as `realism', `anti-realism', and `irrealism' ... Those who work in these areas need to study all of Tennant's book for it moves the arguments and issues significantly forward. The book offers a comprehensive philosophy of mathematics and natural science * Zentralblatt fur Mathematik *
[Tennant's] book addresses a number of important issues in contemporary philosophy, and the reader has much to gain from a careful study of the development. Few stones are left unturned [in] this rich study. * Stewart Shapiro, Mathematical Reviews *
[Tennant's] book addresses a number of important issues in contemporary philosophy, and the reader has much to gain from a careful study of the development. Few stones are left unturned ... this rich study ... presents a delightful and compelling holistic argument against Kripke's meaning-sceptic ... a new, improved version of the manifestation argument, and provides a revival of the positivist notion of `cognitive significance'. The author provides a rigorous criterion aimed at demarcating `the empirically meaningful from the metaphysically meaningless'. He shows that his distinction avoids the now-standard refutations of the notion of cognitive significance. * Stewart Shapiro, Mathematical Reviews *
This is a new major and systematic monograph on the realism debate, written by a very skilful and sophisticated defender of anti-realism ... Tennant attempts to show that [intuitionistic relevant] logic has much wider application than one might suppose. It suffices not only for mathematics but also adequately captures the basic inferential practices of empirical sciences. It would be hard to overestimate the significance of that attempt, since if successful it undermines the charge that anti-realism is a doctrine that cannot really be extended beyond the domain of mathematical discourse. * Tadeusz Szubka, Review of Metaphysics *
'This is a bold book, perhaps even a brave book ... a book broad in scope, and certainly a good book ... Anyone interested in the realist/anti-realist controversy, whichever side she takes, should read it, for it presents the most sophisticated defence of moderate anti-realism to date.' * Mind *
Tennant's views ... constitute quite a unique blend. They not only correct, or modify, or supplement some of Dummett's arguments, including the famous manifestation requirement, but also put the whole [anti-realist] research programme in a quite different metaphilosophical setting, more congenial to the idea of naturalized philosophy ... The book is very lucidly written, and the main arguments are well signposted, presented and summarized. ... it is a very advanced work. * Tadeusz Szubka, Review of Metaphysics *