Warenkorb
Kostenloser Versand
Unsere Operationen sind klimaneutral

The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750-1710) Lucia Loureiro-Porto (Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain)

The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750-1710) von Lucia Loureiro-Porto (Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain)

The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750-1710) Lucia Loureiro-Porto (Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain)


7.50
Zustand - Sehr Gut
Nicht auf Lager

Zusammenfassung

Necessity is a primary meaning expressed diversely in world languages and whose evolution helps describe human cognitive development. By adopting a corpus-based approach, this book studies the five verbs from the history of English diachronically, from the language's origins (c. 750) to the end of the early Modern period (1710).

The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750-1710) Zusammenfassung

The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750-1710) Lucia Loureiro-Porto (Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain)

In the history of English at least five verbs have been found to mean 'need': thurfan, bethurfan, need, behove and mister. By adopting a corpus-based approach, this book studies all of them diachronically, from the origins of the language (c.750) to the end of the early Modern English period (1710).
  • Offers a detailed analysis of the meaning of these five verbs which have been found to mean 'need', filling a gap in the literature on modality and shedding new light on grammaticalization theory
  • Spans the period c.750 to 1710, adopting a corpus-based approach to study the verbs diachronically
  • Explores the evolution of necessity meanings in English, identifying regular semantic changes and challenging some well-established statements
  • Provides a detailed grammaticalization analysis, paying attention to the different Present-Day-English modal classes, including marginal and emerging modals

Über Lucia Loureiro-Porto (Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain)

Lucia Loureiro-Porto teaches grammar and linguistic variation within the Department of Spanish, Modern Languages and Latin at the Universitat de les Illes Balears (Balearic Islands, Spain). She has previously held teaching and research positions at Reed College, Portland, and at the Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Her main research interests are the study of grammaticalization processes in the history of English, English historical syntax and semantics, and sociolinguistic variation from both a synchronic and a diachronic perspective.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Acknowledgements.

Foreword by Manfred Krug.

List of tables.

List of figures.

List of abbreviations.

1 Introduction.

1.1. Preliminary considerations.

1.2. Present-Day English need and need to.

1.2.1. Traditional approaches.

1.2.2. Modern considerations.

1.2.3. Conclusion.

1.3. A diachronic corpus.

1.4. Organization of chapters.

2 Theoretical Foundations.

2.1. Introduction.

2.2. Modality in English.

2.2.1. Types of modality: root and epistemic.

2.2.2. Semantic features of Present-Day English need and need to.

2.3. Grammaticalization.

2.3.1. Processes and parameters of grammaticalization.

2.3.2. English Modals: a paradigmatic case of grammaticalization.

2.4. Impersonal verbs and constructions.

2.4.1. Terminological issues.

2.4.2. Impersonal constructions: definition and structure.

2.4.3. Allen's (1995) classification.

2.5. Summary.

3. Tharf and Betharf.

3.1. Introduction.

3.2. Preterite-presents and pre-modals: morphology, syntax and semantics.

3.2.1. Morphology.

3.2.2. Syntax.

3.2.3. Semantics.

3.3. Tharf and betharf diachronically.

3.3.1. Semantic implications of tharf and betharf: the constraint of polarity.

3.3.1.1. Tharf.

3.3.1.1.1. Barriers.

3.3.1.1.2. External forces.

3.3.1.1.3. Internal forces.

3.3.1.1.4. General forces.

3.3.1.2. Betharf.

3.3.2. Syntactic evidence for auxiliarihood: the importance of complementation.

3.3.2.1. Tharf.

3.3.2.1.1. Types of theme selected by tharf.

3.3.2.1.2. Experiencer verb constructions found with tharf.

3.3.2.2. Betharf.

3.4. Conclusions.

4. Behove and Mister.

4.1. The evolution of behove.

4.1.1. Introduction: The myth of an impersonal verb (Allen 1997).

4.1.2. The rise and fall of a Germanic verb in English.

4.1.2.1. Semantic richness of a verb condemned to marginality.

4.1.2.1.1. Old English: Preference for internal forces.

4.1.2.1.2. Middle English: Peak in semantic richness.

4.1.2.1.2.1. General forces in Middle English.

4.1.2.1.3. Early Modern English: specialization of general forces.

4.1.2.2. Syntactic evidence for a potential grammaticalization.

4.1.3 Conclusions.

4.2. The ephemeral pass of mister through the English language.

4.2.1. Semantics.

4.2.2. Syntax.

4.2.3. Conclusion.

5. Need in the History of English.

5.1. Introduction: Need v.1 and need v.2: one or two verbs?

5.2. Semantic evolution of need.

5.2.1. Physical forces.

5.2.2. Root forces.

5.2.2.1. External forces.

5.2.2.2. Internal forces.

5.2.2.3. General forces.

5.2.3. Epistemic forces.

5.3. Syntactic evolution of need v.1 and need v.2.

5.3.1. Need v.1.

5.3.1.1. Active need v.1.

5.3.1.2. Passive need v.1.

5.3.2. Need v.2.

5.3.2.1. Need v.2: experiencer verb without an experiencer.

5.3.2.2. Need v.2: experiencer verb with an experiencer.

5.3.2.2.1. Types of themes, experiencer, and experiencer verb construction.

5.3.2.2.2. Need v.2 in Type 'Personal' Constructions: evidence for auxiliarihood.

5.3.2.2.2.1. EModE auxiliaries.

5.3.2.2.2.2. Need v.2 in the 'Personal' Type in early Modern English.

5.4. Conclusions.

6. Conclusions.

Appendices.

References.

List of Tables.

Index.

Zusätzliche Informationen

GOR003783039
9781405192705
1405192704
The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750-1710) Lucia Loureiro-Porto (Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain)
Gebraucht - Sehr Gut
Broschiert
John Wiley and Sons Ltd
20090918
292
N/A
Die Abbildung des Buches dient nur Illustrationszwecken, die tatsächliche Bindung, das Cover und die Auflage können sich davon unterscheiden.
Dies ist ein gebrauchtes Buch. Es wurde schon einmal gelesen und weist von der früheren Nutzung Gebrauchsspuren auf. Wir gehen davon aus, dass es im Großen und Ganzen in einem sehr guten Zustand ist. Sollten Sie jedoch nicht vollständig zufrieden sein, setzen Sie sich bitte mit uns in Verbindung.