From the reviews:
Kagan ... takes on the goal of unifying the Intensional Genitive and the Genitive of Negation as one phenomenon. ... This book will be of primary interest to Russianists, as it provides a well-supported analysis of a much-discussed linguistic puzzle in Russian ... . will be of primary interest to those interested in non-canonical genitive use in Russian. ... It is well researched, well-argued and makes an important contribution to the topic of genitive objects and to the field of Russian linguistics in general. (Lauren Ressue, The Linguist List, January, 2013)Abbreviations .- Acknowledgements .- Preface . 1. Introducing the Problem: Structural Case Alterations . 2. Outline of the Book . 3. Methodology, Data and Judgments .- Chapter 1. 1.1 Genitive Objects and the Inherent/Structural Distinction . 1.2. Three Subtypes of Non-Canonical Genitive Case . 1.2.1. Partitive Genitive . 1.2.2. Genitive of Negation . 1.2.3. Intensional Genitive . 1.3. Reorganization of the Subtypes of Non-Canonical Genitive . 1.3.1. The Organization of Non-Canonical Genitive in Previously Proposed Accounts . 1.3.2. Genitive of Negation and Intensional Genitive as s Single Phenomenon . 1. 3. 2.1. Genitive/Accusative Alternation . 1.3.2.2. Native Speaker's Judgments . 1.3.2.3. Semantic Properties that Affect Case-Assignment . 1.3.2.4. Licensing Operators . 1.3.2.5. GenNeg and Intensional Genitive Cross-Linguistically . 1.3.2.6. Genitive of Negation and Intensional Genitive: A Summary . 1.3.3. Irrealis Genitive as Opposed to Partitive Genitive . 1.3.3.1. Properties of the NP . 1.3.3.2. Verbal Aspect . 1.3.3.4. Second Genitive . 1.3.3.5. Cross-Linguistic Data . 1.3.4. Conclusion .- Chapter 2. 2.1. The Configurational Approach 2.1.1. Bailyn (1997) . 2.1.2. Harves (2002a,b) . 2.1.3. Configurational Approach: The Shortcomings . 2.1.3.1. Unaccusativity Hypothesis . 2.1.3.2. Not All Passive and Unaccusative Verbs License GenNeg . 2.1.3.3. GenNeg Assignment to Specific and Definite NPs . 2.1.3.4. Futher Shortcomings . 2.2. The Empty Quantifier Approach . 2.2.1. Syntactic Approaches . 2.2.1.1. Pesetsky (1982) . 2.2.1.2. Bailyn (2004) . 2.2.2. Semantic Approaches . 2.2.2.1. Pereltsvaig (1998, 1999) . 2.2.2.2. The [+/-Q] Feature: Neidle (1988) . 2.3. Perspectival Center: Borschev and Partee . 2.4. Intermediary Conclusion . 2.5. Unaccusativity Hypothesis .- Chapter 3. 3.1. Subjunctive Mood: An Introduction . 3.2. Farkas (2003): The [+/-Decided] Feature . 3.2.1. The Choice of Mood . 3.2.2. Classes of Propositional Attitude Predicates . 3.2.2.1. Epistemic Predicates . 3.2.2.2. Fiction Predicates . 3.2.2.3. Desiderative Predicates . 3.2.2.4. Directive Predicates . 3.2.2.5. A Note on Weak Intensional Predicates . 3.2.2.6. Subjunctive Mood and the [+Decided] Feature . 3.2.3. Subjunctive Mood in Other Environments . 3.2.3.1. Counterfactual Conditionals . 3.2.3.2. Imperative Sentences . 3.2.3.3. Exclamative Sentences . 3.2.3.4. Negation . 3.2.3.5. A Summary .- Chapter 4. 4.1. Non-Semantic Factors . 4.1.1. Variation in Judgments and Dialects . 4.1.2. Register . 4.1.3. Idiosyncratic Properties of Verbs . 4.2. Analysis . 4.2.1. Property Type . 4.2.2. Existential Commitment . 4.2.3. Relating Semantic Type to EC . - Chapter 5. 5.1. Preview: The Importance of REC . 5.2. Case-Assignment and the Strong/ Weak Distinction . 5.2.1. Irrealis Genitive is Licensed by Weak Intensional Verbs . 5.2.2. The Strong/Weak Distinction and REC . 5.2.3. Exceptions . 5.3. Irrealis Genitive with Weak Intensional Verbs . 5.3.1. Two Types of Sentences with Intensional verbs . 5.3.2. Abstract Objects and the Genitive/Accusative Alternation . 5.3.3. Potential Counterexamples: Unexpected Case-Marking . 5.3.3.1. Coercion . 5.3.3.2. Waiting for Transport . 5.4. Individual Verbs . 5.5 Syntactic Constraints . 5.6. Conclusion .- Chapter 6. 6.1. Irrealis Genitive in Negative Contexts . 6.2. Sensitivity to Existential Commitment . 6.2.1. Different Types of Verbs . 6.2.1.1. Creation Verbs . 6.2.1.2. Verbs That Trigger Existential Presuppostion . 6.2.2. Negative Concord Items . 6.2.3. Definite Objects . 6.2.4. Proper Names . 6.2.4.1. Genitive Case-Assignment to Proper Names . 6.2.4.2. 'Existence is Relative' Principle: Borschev and Partee (1998,2002a) . 6.2.4.3. Irrealis Genitive and Existence Relative to a Location . 6.3. Subjunctive Mood and Irrealis Genitive: Shared Properties . 6.3.1. Event-Denoting Constituents . 6.3.2. Genitive Case-Marking and Subjunctive Relative Clauses: Semantic Properties . 6.3.2.1. Scope and Specificity . 6.3.2.2. Existential Commitment . 6.3.3. Genitive and Subjunctive: A Summary .- Chapter 7. 7.1. Aspect and Number Affect Case-Assignment . 7.1.1. Introducing the Problem . 7.1.2. Preview . 7.2. Aspect and Case-Assignment under Negation . 7.2.2. How Aspect Affects Case . 7.2.2.1. Expected Events and Presupposed Objects . 7.2.2.2. Genitive Objects of Perfective Verbs . 7.2.2.3. Previous Approaches: Making the Picture Complete . 7.3. Genitive Case and Number .- Chapter 8. 8.1. Differential Object Marking . 8.1.1. Definiteness . 8.1.1.1. Hebrew . 8.1.1.2. Definiteness and DOM in Other Languages . 8.1.2. Specificity . 8.1.3. Animacy and Its Interaction with Definiteness . 8.1.4. Formal Account of DOM: Aissen (2003) . 8.1.5. Application to Russian . 8.1.5.1. Irrealis Genitive and DOM . 8.1.5.2. The Formal Analysis of DOM and Irrealis Genitive . 8.2. Genitive Complements of Intensive Reflexive Verbs . 8.2.1. An Introduction . 8.2.2. Syntactic Properties of GCIRs . 8.2.3. Semantic Properties of GCIRs .- Conclusion .- Bibliography