For those seeking deeper context and clarity on the Israel-Palestine crisisPolicy of Deceit is the work of a lifetime, a forensic, fair-minded examination of the Hussein-McMahon correspondencethat exposes how the British government broke its promises to the people of Palestine and concealed this betrayal from the British public.
* TLS, Books of the Year *
In a dispassionate, meticulous account of the colliding promises Britain made before the carve-up of the Ottoman Empire, and afterwards denied, Shambrook nails the obfuscation, betrayal and imperialist contempt that underlie the present catastrophe. * Tablet, Best Books of the Year *
Magnificent Shambrooks book is a major historical achievement. He has solved the mystery of the sharif/McMahon agreement. He has overturned the century-long British narrative that Palestine was excluded from the agreement with the sharif. He has also disposed of the notion, promoted by scholars from Albert Hourani to Martin Gilbert, that the truth about the agreement was mysterious or elusive. More than that, he has shown that the sharif/McMahon correspondence may have contained greater legal weight than the famous promise to the global Jewish community two years later in the shape of the Balfour Declaration, which was a statement of intent and not (officially at any rate) an agreement between two parties.
* Peter Oborne, Middle East Eye *
Deeply researched, powerfully argued and meticulously documented, Policy of Deceit lays bare Britains shameful record of lies, broken promises and betrayals that paved the way to the Zionist takeover of Palestine. It also suggests that an official British apology to the Palestinians is long overdue. A strikingly fair-minded book about one of the shabbiest and most sordid chapters in the history of the British Empire.
-- Avi Shlaim, author of The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World
Policy of Deceit is the definitive scholarly work on the McMahonHussein correspondence and its afterlives. With this empirically rich and analytically rigorous book, Shambrook makes an important contribution to the study of Britains direct responsibility for the dispossession of the Palestinian people. -- Abdel Razzaq Takriti, Arab-American Educational Foundation Chair in Arab Studies, Rice University
Basing his narrative on painstaking archival research, Peter Shambrook shows precisely how British policymakers dodged and weaved in order to make the claim that Palestine was never included in the HusseinMcMahon agreement. His forensic dissection of this particular policy of deceit is an important contribution to the historiography of British rule in Palestine.
-- Laila Parsons, Professor of Modern Middle East History, McGill University
Based on extensive research and a thorough survey of the relevant literature, this book grapples with the 100-year-old debate over whether Palestine was included in the territories that the British pledged to Hussein ibn Ali Sharif of Mecca, concluding that Palestine was indeed a twice-promised land. By unravelling why the truth has never been acknowledged by any British government, this revealing study sheds important light on the history of ArabBritish relations. It is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding the roots of the tension between the Arab world and the West.
-- Raja Shehadeh, author of We Could Have Been Friends, My Father and I. A Palestinian Memoir
This is the most comprehensive and incisive exposure of the origins of the British betrayal of Palestine. Based on thorough archival research, it brings to a close an old historiographical debate by showing clearly that Britain pledged to make Palestine part of the Arab world during the First World War, and it reveals why this promise was concealed from the British public. Not only is this a vital correction regarding a crucial moment in Palestines history, it is also a call for contemporary Britain to acknowledge and apologise for its treachery towards the Palestinians.
-- Ilan Pappe, Professor of History and Director of the European Centre for Palestine Studies, University of Exeter, and author of The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
In this thorough and incisive piece of historical detective work, Peter Shambrook conclusively scotches some of the myths and delusions that for over a century have surrounded Britains handling of the future of Palestine. The Balfour Declaration of 1917, Shambrook shows in lucid detail, was incompatible with the commitment made by the British two years earlier to Hussein ibn Ali, the Sharif of Mecca, that Palestine would come under independent Arab rule. A riveting account of a long-running saga of British double-dealing and evasion,Policy of Deceitis a rigorous, accessible and important contribution to theliterature on Britains imperial role in the Middle East. The roots of the continuing conflict between Jews and Palestinians there, Shambrook shows, were made in Britain.
-- Adam Sutcliffe, Professor of European History, Kings College London
Crisply, forensically and objectively, Policy of Deceit refutes once and for all the contention that Britain excluded Palestine from the Arab lands to which it pledged independence in the 191516 correspondence with the Sharif of Mecca.
-- John McHugo, author of A Concise History of the Arabs
Shambrook revisits the controversies around the HusseinMcMahon Correspondence of World War I, when the British government convinced the Sharif of Mecca to launch an Arab revolt against the Ottoman Empire in return for the promise that Britain would recognise Arab independence after the war. He concentrates on the key question in the Correspondence debate: was Palestine included in Britains promise to Sharif Hussein? Dr Shambrooks extensive research into a variety of public records, private papers and memoirs leads him to conclude that the British government not only included Palestine in its promise but also lied about it all along. Historians will find a refreshing reassessment of claims to the contrary made by such prominent historians as Isaiah Friedman and Elie Kedourie. Shambrooks conclusions will doubtless generate new debate about Britains role in fostering one of the most bitter international conflicts of the past 100 years.
-- Philip S. Khoury, Ford International Professor of History, MIT
Shambrooks deft handling of the primary sources brilliantly brings to life how British imperial officials and politicians contrived to determine then defend an increasingly problematic policy in Palestine.
-- Anthony Gorman, Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies, University of Edinburgh
Peter Shambrooks incredibly well-documentedbook [is] a forensic analysis of the correspondence between British officials and the Sharif of Hejaz.
* Friday Times *
A thorough examination of a subject with profound and ongoing ramifications.
* Publishers Weekly *
Peter Shambrook, who has a doctorate in modern Middle Eastern history, has attempted to settle the account once and for all by doing more research than almost any other historian [creating] a fluent and readable account.
* Tablet *
'Peter Shambrooks forensic analysis of primary sources in this countrys dealings with Arab leaders, particularly in the correspondence of 191517, should finally nail the issue of Britains double-dealing and lead to an honest acknowledgement of Britains failures... Palestine was a twice-promised land, and Britains dishonest dealings are irrevocably revealed in the authors detailed exploration.'
* Church Times *
