Cart
Free Shipping in the UK
Proud to be B-Corp

Ideology in the Language of Judges Susan U. Philips (Professor of Anthropology, Professor of Anthropology, University of Arizona)

Ideology in the Language of Judges By Susan U. Philips (Professor of Anthropology, Professor of Anthropology, University of Arizona)

Summary

Studying the language of judges in courtrooms, the author of this text demonstrates that they are not impartial arbiters of due process, but are influenced by their own political-ideological stance and interpretation of the law. The effect on their interaction with defendants is shown.

Ideology in the Language of Judges Summary

Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control by Susan U. Philips (Professor of Anthropology, Professor of Anthropology, University of Arizona)

Philips looks at the languages of judges in the courtroom to show that, while judges see themselves as impartial agents of the constitutional right to due process, there is actually much diversity in the way that judges interract with defendants due to their interpretations of the law, their attitudes toward courtroom control, and their own political-ideological stances regarding due process. She uses courtroom transcripts, interviews, and the written law itself to show how ideological diversity is organized in legal discourse.

Ideology in the Language of Judges Reviews

Ideology in the Language of Judges gives evidence that people do not compartmentalize their beliefs, however much they may wish to or belive that they are capable of it. Ideology reveals itself in behavior and speech. Susan Philips is an anthropologist who decide to study culture and social structure in the U.S. court system. To acquaint herself with the 'language'' she attended a year of law school. * Notes on LInguistics *
In a time when some scholars are bemoaning an apparent drop in attention to the role of ideology in legal settings, Philip's new book comes as a welcome intervention. The author uses fine-grained analysis of courtroom language to reveal the pervasive influence of ideology on trial court judges' practices. Followers of Philip's pioneering work in legal language will not be disappointed; the volume lives up to the exacting standard she set for the field of courtroom (and classroom) discourse. * Language in Society *
Conclusions are firmly embedded in rigorous observation and data analysis by Philips and represent an important contribution to studies of legal discourse. * Word *

Table of Contents

Introduction 1: Ideology in Discourse 2: The Myth of the Trial Court Judge as Nonideological 3: Intertextual Relations between Written and Spoken Genres of Law 4: Two Ideological Stances in Taking Guilty Pleas 5: Judges' Ideologies of Courtroom Control 6: Ideological Diversity in Legal Discourses Appendixes Appendix A: Social Background Questionnaire Appendix B: Career History Interview Appendix C: Rule 17, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure: Pleas of Guilty and No Contest Appendix D: Plea Agreement Appendix E: Transcription Notations Appendix F: Four Changes of Plea / Guilty Plea Transcripts Appendix G: Refusal of Plea Agreement in Aborted Sentencing Transcript Notes References Index

Additional information

NPB9780195113402
9780195113402
0195113403
Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control by Susan U. Philips (Professor of Anthropology, Professor of Anthropology, University of Arizona)
New
Hardback
Oxford University Press Inc
1998-05-21
224
N/A
Book picture is for illustrative purposes only, actual binding, cover or edition may vary.
This is a new book - be the first to read this copy. With untouched pages and a perfect binding, your brand new copy is ready to be opened for the first time

Customer Reviews - Ideology in the Language of Judges