"Laffey and Leonard-Fleckman have produced a thoroughly researched, readable, and engaging commentary on the book of Ruth. The authors guide the reader through a variety of opinions, whether from the enlightening `contributing voices' included throughout or from the occasional disagreements of the lead authors themselves. It is refreshing to see diverse views presented without competition, revealing, without the usual one-upmanship of academic discourse, a rich layering of interpretive possibilities."Caroline Johnson Hodge, College of the Holy Cross
"Two scholarsone at the dawn of a fine career, the other at the top of her crafttake up the challenge of decoding the biblical book of Ruth, an ancient text that has yet to divulge all of its secrets despite the many centuries of focused interest. Feminists both but with differing sensibilities and training, they have pooled resources and imagination to successfully produce a commentary in the classic mode, yet one in which all issues are scrutinized through boldly tinted lenses. The result is an engaging, elegant, and insightful contribution that should reward all readers, in and beyond the profession."Jack M. Sasson, Professor Emeritus, Vanderbilt University
"These two authors bring a model of intergenerational feminist scholarship to an intergenerational biblical pair, Ruth and Naomi. Postcolonial analysis and global feminist theological insights provide rich food for thought."WATER
"Laffey (an experienced scholar) and Leonard-Fleckman (a new scholar) bring a rich combination of wisdom, insight, and sound biblical scholarship to this commentary."The Bible Today
"This commentary is truly a dialogical work and incorporates complementary and opposing perspectives in a cohesive narrative meant for biblical scholars, pastors, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of Scripture. Laffey and Leonard-Fleckman beautifully unite many voices and unique perspectives in their commentary on Ruth and animate this text with a new vitality."Catholic Library World
"Both of the authors are attentive to feminist issues such as female agency, power, authority, and ethnicity, but their interpretations do not necessarily coalesce. As a case in point, the authors present opposing arguments with regard to the books date of composition, leaving readers to make their own determinations. While the commentary resists consensus and maintains interpretive tensions, it is nevertheless rife with provocative insights into the book of Ruth."
Megan Fullerton Strollo, Union Presbyterian Seminary
