Review ~ International Review of Biblical Studies, vol. 51, 2004/05
This careful and meticulous study challenges many widely held views about the gospels and their sources and proposes completely new solutions to old problems. It will be essential reading for any engaged in study of the history of the synoptic tradition. -Professor Christopher Tuckett, Pembroke College -- Christopher Tuckett * Blurb from reviewer *
In this detailed and provocative study, Burkett musters strong evidence against the notion that any one of the Synoptic Gospels served as a source for either of the others. Rather, he believes Matthew and Mark used common sources, Mark and Luke used common sources, and Mark often conflated sources that were also used respectively by Matthew and Luke. If Burkett's arguments can be refuted, it is important that this be done as quickly as possible. If they cannot, and this may well be the case, then studies of the Synoptic Problem must take a significantly new and different direction. In either case, scholars would be well advised to give this book their most serious attention. - William O. Walker, Jr., Jennie Farris Railey King Professor Emeritus of Religion, Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas. -- William O. Walker * Blurb from reviewer *
'[T]he thrust of Burkett's thesis is entirely clear. He draws attention to the deficiencies in the prevailing synoptic theories and attempts a comprehensive reconstruction of Gospel sources.' ~ Nicholas H. Taylor, Vol 28.5, 2006 -- Nicholas H. Taylor * Journal for the Study of the New Testament *
Burkett deserves accolades for the clarity and comprehensiveness with which he writes. His argument throughout is easy to follow with each section introduced clearly and summarized efficiently and with plenty of examples and tables throughout...Like other such complex theories, the attractiveness of Burkett's theory is its comprehensiveness, attempting to account for everything one encounters in each Gospel and in a detailed comparison of the Synoptics.- Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, December 2005 * Journal of Evangelical Theological Society *
In Rethinking the Gospel Sources: From Proto-Mark to Mark, Delbert Burkett provides the most detailed argument for a multistaged development of the Gospel of Mark yet to appear in English. His argument is clearly presented and well illustrated with many synoptic charts and displays of literary details drawn from the Synoptics...In sum, the book is a fine addition to the fine literature on the Synoptic Problem in the twenty-first century...it is time to turn scholarly attention to more complex reconstructions of the literary history of the Synoptics, like this one offered by Burkett. -Review of Biblical Literature, May 2005 * Review of Biblical Literature *
In Rethinking the Gospel Sources: From Proto-Mark to Mark, Delbert Burkett provides the most detailed argument for a multistaged development of the Gospel of Mark yet to appear in English. His argument is clearly presented and well illustrated with many synoptic charts and displays of literary details drawn from the Synoptics...In sum, the book is a fine addition to the fine literature on the Synoptic Problem in the twenty-first century...it is time to turn scholarly attention to more complex reconstructions of the literary history of the Synoptics, like this one offered by Burkett. -Review of Biblical Literature, May 2005 * Review of Biblical Literature *
'this is a study which must be taken seriously. The way he shows that the writers followed through their sources in sequence is particularly impressive' -- C. S Rodd * Theology *
