The debates between those who label every massacre and deportation as genocide in solidarity with the suffering victims and the academics who stick to their scholarly values and distinguish meticulously between distinct methods of mass murder are elucidated effectively. Ultimately, the book successfully demonstrates how the concept of genocide, instead of denoting a real event in history, is a product of various political needs, how it creates historical distortions, and how it is used and manipulated. The Greek example illustrates how difficult it still is to construct a memory based on universal values that shares in the pain of all those who suffer around the world. * Slavic Review
Sjoeberg's book is a must-read for history students inclined to embrace historical knowledge as a definite credo. With much agility, Sjoeberg convinces his readership of the liveliness and hence the instability of the way a body politic, at all levels, relates to its past. One can call this postmodern; it is also Heraclitan. * H-Nationalism
The concluding section, like the chapters that precede it, is meticulous and systematically argued and it summarizes all the findings presented in each chapter. Right at the end Sjoeberg allows for a glimmer of optimism and notes that irrespective of whether future research will confirm or dismiss the claims that the Ottoman Greeks experienced a genocide, the dynamics that campaign unleashed may in fact lead away from its explicit ethnocentrism. It is too early to tell, as the controversy continues and more research is required. But the ongoing debates among activists and academics will benefit enormously from Sjoeberg's outstanding scholarly analysis. * Journal of Social History
Erik Sjoeberg has written a dense, varied, and admirable book...a thoughtful, well-written, and original contribution to the scholarship on the politics of memory in the aftermath of mass violence. Sjoeberg treats themes as wide-ranging as cultural trauma, diaspora politics, ideology, national identity, etc. His breadth of reading and use of Greek-language sources and critical treatment of the different positions in the (often polarized) debates add significantly to the quality of the book...One can only hope that future publications on the Ottoman Greek catastrophe take Sjoeberg's arguments seriously. * Hungarian Historical Review
Sjoeberg maintains a sober balance between respect for the reality of historical trauma and critical interrogation of historians' and activists' methods. This is an excellent study that also offers insightful analysis into how new transnational memory cultures have emerged since the 1980s. * Hans-Lukas Kieser, University of Zurich
