Known as the Father of His Country, George Washington is sometimes viewed as a demi-god for what he was and did, rather than for what he thought. In addition to being a popular icon for the forces of American nationalism, he served as commander-in-chief of the victorious Continental Army. That he played a key role in securing the adoption of the Constitution is well known, but few credit him with a political philosophy that actively shaped the constitutional tradition. In this revisionist study, Glenn Phelps argues that Washington's political thought influenced the principles informing the federal government then and now. Disinclined to enter the debates by which the framers hammered out a consensus, Washington instead sought to promote his way of thinking through private correspondence and the example of his public life. From these sources Phelps draws out his political ideas and demonstrates that Washington developed a coherent and consistent view of a republican government of a continental scale long before Madison, Hamilton, and other nationalists - a view grounded in classically conservative republicanism and continentally-minded commercialism. That he was only partically successful in building the constitutional system that he intended does not undercut his theoretical contribution. Even his failures affected the way the United States' constitutional tradition developed. Phelps examines Washington's political ideas not as they were perceived by his contemporaries but in his own words - that is, he attempts to show what Washington believed, not what others thought he believed. He shows how Washington's political values remained consistent over time, regardless of who his counsellors or ghost writers were. Using letters Washington wrote to friends and family - written free from the constraints of public politics - Phelps reveals a man with a passionate commitment to a fully developed idea of constitutional republic on a continental scale. In recent years scholarship about Washington has seemed to focus on mythmaking. For readers interested in the founding period and constitutionalism, Phelps explores the substance behind the myth.