Cart
Free US shipping over $10
Proud to be B-Corp

Role Theory and the Cognitive Architecture of British Appeasement Decisions Stephen G. Walker (Arizona State University, Phoenix)

Role Theory and the Cognitive Architecture of British Appeasement Decisions By Stephen G. Walker (Arizona State University, Phoenix)

Role Theory and the Cognitive Architecture of British Appeasement Decisions by Stephen G. Walker (Arizona State University, Phoenix)


$253.39
Condition - New
Only 2 left

Role Theory and the Cognitive Architecture of British Appeasement Decisions Summary

Role Theory and the Cognitive Architecture of British Appeasement Decisions: Symbolic and Strategic Interaction in World Politics by Stephen G. Walker (Arizona State University, Phoenix)

Appeasement is a controversial strategy of conflict management and resolution in world politics. Its reputation is sullied by foreign policy failures ending in war or defeat in which the appeasing state suffers diplomatic and military losses by making costly concessions to other states. Britains appeasement policies toward Germany, Italy, and Japan in the 1930s are perhaps the most notorious examples of the patterns of failure associated with this strategy. Is appeasements reputation deserved or is this strategy simply misunderstood and perhaps improperly applied?

Role theory offers a general theoretical solution to the appeasement puzzle that addresses these questions, and the answers should be interesting to political scientists, historians, students, and practitioners of cooperation and conflict strategies in world politics. As a social-psychological theory of human behavior, role theory has the capacity to unite the insights of various existing theories of agency and structure in the domain of world politics. Demonstrating this claim is the methodological aim in this book and its main contribution to breaking new ground in international relations theory.

Role Theory and the Cognitive Architecture of British Appeasement Decisions Reviews

"This book unequivocally demonstrates the theoretical and empirical utility of role theory for IR while at the same time providing new insights into British foreign policy in the 1930s. Walkers mix of historical narrative and formal analysis is unexcelled. All those concerned with agents and structures will find this book enlightening and refreshinga must read."

John Vasquez, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

"Observers of world politics have long agreed that Britain's decisions to appease Imperial Japan, Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany contributed to the outbreak of World War II, but they have proposed varying explanations for those decisions. Drawing upon both archival evidence and mathematical analysis, Stephen Walker's path-breaking new book develops a compelling case for role theory as a general analytic solution to the appeasement puzzle. His conclusion indicates that leaders beliefs and preferences provide a powerful explanation for how and why foreign policy decisions are made."

Ole R. Holsti, Duke University

About Stephen G. Walker (Arizona State University, Phoenix)

Stephen G. Walker is Emeritus Professor of Political Science at Arizona State University. He served as a co-editor of International Studies Quarterly (1985) and as a vice-president of the International Society of Political Psychology (1997-1999) and the International Studies Association (2003-2004). He received the Distinguished Scholar Award from the Foreign Policy Section of the International Studies Association in 2003.

Table of Contents

Part I: Role Theory: The Puzzle of Britains Appeasement Decisions in the 1930s. 1. The Appeasement Puzzle in World Politics 2. Modeling the Appeasement Strategy. 3. Role Theory and the Uncertainty Problem in International Relations Theory. Part II: Role Demands: Substantive Rationality and Structural Adaptation. 4. Britains Roles in the Sino-Japanese Conflict, 1931-1933. 5. Britains Roles in the Italo-Abyssinian and Rhineland Conflicts, 1934-1936. 6. Britains Roles in the Search for Peace, 1937-1938. 7. Britains Roles on the Road to War, 1939-1941. Part III: Role Conceptions: Bounded Rationality and Experiential Learning. 8. Psychological Mechanisms and British Decision-Making Processes. 9. Turning Points for Peace: The Anschluss and the Sudeten Conflict in 1938. 10. Turning Points for War: The Prague Coup and the Polish Conflict, 1939. Part IV: Role Enactments: Communicative Rationality and Altercasting. 11. Binary Role Theory and Britains Appeasement Decisions. 12. Crossing Simons Bridge: Is Binary Role Theory a Theory of Everything

Additional information

NPB9780415832359
9780415832359
0415832357
Role Theory and the Cognitive Architecture of British Appeasement Decisions: Symbolic and Strategic Interaction in World Politics by Stephen G. Walker (Arizona State University, Phoenix)
New
Hardback
Taylor & Francis Ltd
2013-10-14
262
N/A
Book picture is for illustrative purposes only, actual binding, cover or edition may vary.
This is a new book - be the first to read this copy. With untouched pages and a perfect binding, your brand new copy is ready to be opened for the first time

Customer Reviews - Role Theory and the Cognitive Architecture of British Appeasement Decisions